Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
Automagically enable numbering if we output more than one patch.
Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:44:12AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
[PATCH 1/1] looks a bit silly, and automagically handling this in
git-format-patch makes some scripting around it a lot more pleasant.
I think you should not use "-n" if you do not want to have the numbers.
In circumstances as yours, where you can have patch series larger than
one, I imagine that the "[PATCH 1/1]" bears an important information,
which is not present in "[PATCH]": this patch series contains only one
patch.
IOW I do not like your patch: too much DWIDNS (Do What I Did NOT Say) for
me.
How about the contrary ?
Still DWIDNSAA.
Every piece of DWIM can be translated as "do what I didn't say". If you had to
say it, it wouldn't be DWIM after all.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
