Hi, On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Mike Hommey wrote: > Automagically enable numbering if we output more than one patch. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:44:12AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > > > > > [PATCH 1/1] looks a bit silly, and automagically handling this in > > > git-format-patch makes some scripting around it a lot more pleasant. > > > > I think you should not use "-n" if you do not want to have the numbers. > > In circumstances as yours, where you can have patch series larger than > > one, I imagine that the "[PATCH 1/1]" bears an important information, > > which is not present in "[PATCH]": this patch series contains only one > > patch. > > > > IOW I do not like your patch: too much DWIDNS (Do What I Did NOT Say) for > > me. > > How about the contrary ? Still DWIDNSAA. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
