phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx writes: > I agree it is confusing, Elijah renamed it from ll-merge.c relatively > recently 6723899932e (merge-ll: rename from ll-merge, 2023-05-16). It > looks like the idea was to group it with the other merge* files: That reasoning cuts both ways. When you are only interested in the upper level API functions, being able to skip ll-anything as "low level details" is a powerful thing. merge-ll & hash-ll separated far apart will make it impossible.
