Re: [PATCH 3/4] merge options: add a conflict style member

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio

On 08/03/2024 15:46, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

diff --git a/merge-ll.c b/merge-ll.c
index 6570707297d..bf1077ae092 100644
--- a/merge-ll.c
+++ b/merge-ll.c
..
-#define LL_MERGE_OPTIONS_INIT {0}
+#define LL_MERGE_OPTIONS_INIT { .conflict_style = -1 }

Makes sense, and this obviously makes the previous step worth doing.

It looks quite wrong that low-level merge options definition is
hosted in a file whose name is merge low-level.  Is it too late to
rename the file to fix this, by the way?

I agree it is confusing, Elijah renamed it from ll-merge.c relatively
recently 6723899932e (merge-ll: rename from ll-merge, 2023-05-16). It
looks like the idea was to group it with the other merge* files:

    merge-ll: rename from ll-merge
A long term (but rather minor) pet-peeve of mine was the name
    ll-merge.[ch].  I thought it made it harder to realize what stuff was
    related to merging when I was working on the merge machinery and trying
    to improve it.
Further, back in d1cbe1e6d8a ("hash-ll.h: split out of hash.h to remove
    dependency on repository.h", 2023-04-22), we have split the portions of
    hash.h that do not depend upon repository.h into a "hash-ll.h" (due to
    the recommendation to use "ll" for "low-level" in its name[1], but which
    I used as a suffix precisely because of my distaste for "ll-merge").
    When we discussed adding additional "*-ll.h" files, a request was made
    that we use "ll" consistently as either a prefix or a suffix.  Since it
    is already in use as both a prefix and a suffix, the only way to do so
    is to rename some files.
Besides my distaste for the ll-merge.[ch] name, let me also note that
    the files
      ll-fsmonitor.h, ll-hash.h, ll-merge.h, ll-object-store.h, ll-read-cache.h
    would have essentially nothing to do with each other and make no sense
    to group.  But giving them the common "ll-" prefix would group them.  Using
    "-ll" as a suffix thus seems just much more logical to me.  Rename
    ll-merge.[ch] to merge-ll.[ch] to achieve this consistency, and to
    ensure we get a more logical grouping of files.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/kl6lsfcu1g8w.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/


Best Wishes

Phillip




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux