Re: [PATCH 1/2] refs/reftable: don't fail empty transactions in repo without HEAD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

> So it's not uninitialized, it rather is stale.

What I wanted to say with "technically it is not" was that these two
are moral equivalents in the code around there after the early return
happened ;-).

> I can send a follow-up patch to remove the useless variable assignment
> in the test, but other than that I don't think anything needs to change
> here.

OK, thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux