Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Linus Arver <linusa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> Nit: this patch and the next one will become commits, so perhaps: >>> >>> s/In the next patch/In a following commit/ >> >> TBH I've always wondered whether "patch" or "commit" matters --- I've >> seen examples of patch series that referred to "commits" instead of >> "patches", and vice versa. I was hoping to hear an opinion on this, so >> I'm happy to see (and apply) your suggestion. Thanks. > > I think it is just fine to use either; sticking to one you pick > consistently in the same series would have value. If you prefer > commit, then fine. If you like patch, that's fine too. Makes sense, thanks.
