Linus Arver <linusa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Nit: this patch and the next one will become commits, so perhaps: >> >> s/In the next patch/In a following commit/ > > TBH I've always wondered whether "patch" or "commit" matters --- I've > seen examples of patch series that referred to "commits" instead of > "patches", and vice versa. I was hoping to hear an opinion on this, so > I'm happy to see (and apply) your suggestion. Thanks. I think it is just fine to use either; sticking to one you pick consistently in the same series would have value. If you prefer commit, then fine. If you like patch, that's fine too.
