On Wednesday, 21 February 2024 23:46:10 CET Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jean-Noël AVILA <jn.avila@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > As a translator, I'm less bothered by editing a sentence to remove a question > > mark (maybe enforcing a language style and reformulating the sentence by the > > way), than by translating again and again similar sentences. > > Sure, but if the original in C locale used to be "FOO BAR?" and you > translated it to "foo bar?" in your language, and then a patch > updates the string in the source to "FOO BAR", doesn't msgmerge > notice that the original as a "fuzzy" matching and offer you > something like > > # fuzzy > msgid "FOO BAR" > msgstr "foo bar?" > > so that all you have to do is to remove '?' anyway? Yes, it works as expected. > So I do not > think you'd need to translate the "FOO BAR" part again and again. Sorry for not being clear: I don't consider changing a question to an assertion is translating "again and again". This change is completely entitled to end up on translators desk, because it involves possibly changing the whole structure of the sentence. About "again and again", I was more refering to strings such as "could not stat '%s'" and then "could not stat file '%s'". > > But the above assumes that for your language, the ONLY thing to turn > such a rhetorical "passive aggressive" question into grammatically > correct statement of a fact is to remove the question mark. It may > not be universally true for all languages, and for some language, > even after msgmerge did its job correctly, you may need to do more > than just removing the question mark to adjust the remaining "foo > bar" part. > I perfectly agree with you. Thanks
