Re: [PATCH] rebase: make warning less passive aggressive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:02:04AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >> Or if it does touch the po files it could as well update the
> >> translations.
> >>
> >> There are changes that can be trivially translated without any knowledge
> >> of the target language.
> >
> > You need to know the target language before deciding it is OK and
> > sufficient to just remove ̉¿? from around a sentence to make it from
> > a question to a statement of a fact.  You may know enough, but
> > reviewers may not be.  In addition, it would allow bypassing the
> > language teams, which is the most serious problem I see in such an
> > attitude.
> 
> Oops, "attitude" -> "approach".

That's certainly true that even if you know how to remove a question
mark you may not find a reviewer who knows how to remove one.

Nonetheless, if you do find both a patch author and a reviewer that know
how to remove a question mark what is the problem with not involving
several language teams to remove a question mark?

Thanks

Michal




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux