Re: [PATCH v2] rerere: fix crash during clear

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Marcel Röthke <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> When rerere_clear is called, for instance when aborting a rebase, and
> the current conflict does not have a pre or postimage recorded git
> crashes with a SEGFAULT in has_rerere_resolution when accessing the
> status member of struct rerere_dir.

I had to read this twice before realizing the reason why I found it
hard to grok was because of a missing comma between "recorded" and
"git".

> This happens because scan_rerere_dir
> only allocates the status field in struct rerere_dir when a post or
> preimage was found.

But that is not really the root cause, no?  Readers following the
above text are probably wondering why the preimage was not recorded,
when a conflict resulted in stopping a mergy-command and invoking
rerere machinery, before rerere_clear() got called.  Is that
something that usually happen?  How?  Do we have a reproduction
sequence of such a state that we can make it into a new test in
t4200 where we already have tests for "git rerere clear" and its
friends?

> In some cases a segfault may happen even if a post
> or preimage was recorded if it was not for the variant of interest and
> the number of the variant that is present is lower than the variant of
> interest.

Ditto.  What sequence of events would lead to such a state?

The answer *can* be ".git/rr-cache being a normal directory, the
user can poke around, removing files randomly, which can create such
a problematic situation", and the reproduction test *can* also be to
simulate such an end-user action, but I am asking primarily because
I want to make sure that we are *not* losing or failing to create
necessary preimage files, causing this problem to users who do not
muck with files in .git/rr-cache themselves.

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux