Re: What's the recommendation for forgetting all rerere's records?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sean Allred <allred.sean@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I've driven myself a little nuts trying to reproduce it this morning,
> but in doing so I've come to an important discovery: this bug presents
> if `core.autocrlf=true` but does *not* present if `core.autocrlf=input`.
>
> For completeness and future reference, the following script reproduces
> the issue on Windows:
>
>     [clip]
>
> At the end of this script, the 'bad merge' is still the recorded
> resolution and no rerere record exists for the 'good merge'.
>
> Just in case there's another piece of config somehow relevant, here's a
> dump of the system that reproduced this:
>
>     [clip]
>
> It's worth noting at this point that while I believe I reproduced on
> macOS last week, that doesn't jive with the available evidence (and I
> can't reproduce it on macOS this morning, though I suspect that has more
> to do with native use of LF over CRLF than anything else).

Is there a good way to convert this to a proper bug report without
losing the context?

--
Sean Allred




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux