There was enough going on with that prior email that I gave it another look and found some errors. > $ echo 'bad merge' >file > $ git add file > > $ EDITOR=: git rebase --continue > file: needs merge > You must edit all merge conflicts and then > mark them as resolved using git add > > $ git rebase --abort > > $ git rebase main > Auto-merging file > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in file > error: could not apply b4d7aeb... local > hint: Resolve all conflicts manually, mark them as resolved with > hint: "git add/rm <conflicted_files>", then run "git rebase --continue". > hint: You can instead skip this commit: run "git rebase --skip". > hint: To abort and get back to the state before "git rebase", run "git rebase --abort". > Recorded preimage for 'file' > Could not apply b4d7aeb... local > > $ git checkout --merge . > Recreated 1 merge conflict > > $ git rerere forget . > error: no remembered resolution for 'file' > > $ echo 'good merge' >file > > $ EDITOR=: git rebase --continue > file: needs merge > You must edit all merge conflicts and then > mark them as resolved using git add This section should have read: $ echo 'bad merge' >file $ git add file $ EDITOR=: git rebase --continue Recorded resolution for 'file'. [detached HEAD 5e3c431] local 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/feature. $ git reset --hard @{1} HEAD is now at b4d7aeb local $ git rebase main Auto-merging file CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in file error: could not apply b4d7aeb... local hint: Resolve all conflicts manually, mark them as resolved with hint: "git add/rm <conflicted_files>", then run "git rebase --continue". hint: You can instead skip this commit: run "git rebase --skip". hint: To abort and get back to the state before "git rebase", run "git rebase --abort". Resolved 'file' using previous resolution. Could not apply b4d7aeb... local $ git checkout --merge . Recreated 1 merge conflict $ git rerere forget . error: no remembered resolution for 'file' I've driven myself a little nuts trying to reproduce it this morning, but in doing so I've come to an important discovery: this bug presents if `core.autocrlf=true` but does *not* present if `core.autocrlf=input`. For completeness and future reference, the following script reproduces the issue on Windows: git init echo aaa >file git add file git commit -ambase git branch feature echo bbb >file git commit -amremote git switch feature echo ccc >file git commit -amlocal git config rerere.enabled true git config core.autocrlf true # <-- # setup complete; let's rebase! git rebase main echo 'bad merge' >file git add file EDITOR=: git rebase --continue # uh oh; that was a bad resolution; let's try again git reset --hard @{1} git rebase main git checkout --merge . git rerere forget . # fails echo 'good merge' >file git add file EDITOR=: git rebase --continue At the end of this script, the 'bad merge' is still the recorded resolution and no rerere record exists for the 'good merge'. Just in case there's another piece of config somehow relevant, here's a dump of the system that reproduced this: $ git config --list --show-scope | sort global user.email=[clip] global user.name=[clip] local core.autocrlf=true local core.bare=false local core.filemode=false local core.ignorecase=true local core.logallrefupdates=true local core.repositoryformatversion=0 local core.symlinks=false local rerere.enabled=true system core.autocrlf=input system core.fscache=true system core.fsmonitor=true system core.symlinks=false system credential.helper=manager system credential.https://dev.azure.com.usehttppath=true system diff.astextplain.textconv=astextplain system filter.lfs.clean=git-lfs clean -- %f system filter.lfs.process=git-lfs filter-process system filter.lfs.required=true system filter.lfs.smudge=git-lfs smudge -- %f system http.sslbackend=schannel system http.sslcainfo=C:/Program Files/Git/mingw64/etc/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt system init.defaultbranch=main system pull.rebase=true $ git --version git version 2.43.0.windows.1 It's worth noting at this point that while I believe I reproduced on macOS last week, that doesn't jive with the available evidence (and I can't reproduce it on macOS this morning, though I suspect that has more to do with native use of LF over CRLF than anything else). -- Sean Allred