Re: [PATCH 2/2] sequencer: unset GIT_CHERRY_PICK_HELP for 'exec' commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Vegard

On 08/02/2024 08:48, Vegard Nossum wrote:
I'm sorry, but I'm confused about what I'm supposed to do now.

There is now another test case and it sounds like you would prefer that
one over mine, but I didn't write it and there is no SOB, so I cannot
submit that with the fix if I were to "squash them together".

Here's my SOB for the diff in https://lore.kernel.org/git/4e6d503a-8564-4536-82a7-29c489f5fec3@xxxxxxxxx/

Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I think that typically for small suggestions like that we just add a Helped-by: trailer but feel free to add my SOB if you want.

I am not a regular contributor so I don't have a good grasp on things
like why you don't want a new test file for this,

I think keeping related tests together helps contributors see which test files to run when they're changing code (running the whole suite each time is too slow). There is also a (small) setup overhead for each new file. For tests like this it is a bit ambiguous whether it belongs with the other "rebase --exec" tests or the other "cherry-pick" tests. I opted to put it with the other "rebase --exec" tests as I think it is really fixing a bug with rebase rather than cherry-pick.

Best Wishes

Phillip




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux