Re: [PATCH 2/2] sequencer: unset GIT_CHERRY_PICK_HELP for 'exec' commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/02/2024 17:39, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

On 06/02/2024 03:54, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

On 06/02/2024 00:09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Perhaps it is a good idea to squash them together as a single bugfix
patch?

I think so, I'm not sure we want to add a new test file just for this
either. Having the test in a separate file was handy for debugging but
I think something like the diff below would suffice though I wouldn't
object to checking the author of the cherry-picked commit

Very true (I didn't even notice that the original "bug report
disguised as a test addition" was inventing a totally new file).

I'm sorry, but I'm confused about what I'm supposed to do now.

There is now another test case and it sounds like you would prefer that
one over mine, but I didn't write it and there is no SOB, so I cannot
submit that with the fix if I were to "squash them together".

I am not a regular contributor so I don't have a good grasp on things
like why you don't want a new test file for this, or why you (as the
maintainer) can't just squash the patches yourself if that's what you
prefer.

Thanks,


Vegard




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux