[PATCH v2 2/5] merge-ort: do check `parse_tree()`'s return value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>

The previous commit fixed a bug where a missing tree was reported, but
not treated as an error.

This patch addresses the same issue for the remaining two callers of
`parse_tree()`.

This change is not accompanied by a regression test because the code in
question is only reached at the `checkout` stage, i.e. after the merge
has happened (and therefore the tree objects could only be missing if
the disk had gone bad in that short time window, or something similarly
tricky to recreate in the test suite).

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
---
 merge-ort.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/merge-ort.c b/merge-ort.c
index c37fc035f13..79d9e18f63d 100644
--- a/merge-ort.c
+++ b/merge-ort.c
@@ -4379,9 +4379,11 @@ static int checkout(struct merge_options *opt,
 	unpack_opts.verbose_update = (opt->verbosity > 2);
 	unpack_opts.fn = twoway_merge;
 	unpack_opts.preserve_ignored = 0; /* FIXME: !opts->overwrite_ignore */
-	parse_tree(prev);
+	if (parse_tree(prev) < 0)
+		return -1;
 	init_tree_desc(&trees[0], prev->buffer, prev->size);
-	parse_tree(next);
+	if (parse_tree(next) < 0)
+		return -1;
 	init_tree_desc(&trees[1], next->buffer, next->size);
 
 	ret = unpack_trees(2, trees, &unpack_opts);
-- 
gitgitgadget





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux