I recently looked into issues where git merge-tree calls returned bogus data (in one instance returning an empty tree for non-empty merge parents). By the time I had a look at the corresponding repository, the issue was no longer reproducible, but a closer look at the code combined with some manual experimenting turned up the fact that missing tree objects aren't handled as errors by git merge-tree. While at it, I added a commit on top that tries to catch all remaining unchecked parse_tree() calls. This patch series is based on js/merge-tree-3-trees because I introduced three unchecked parse_tree() calls in that topic branch. Johannes Schindelin (4): merge-tree: fail with a non-zero exit code on missing tree objects merge-ort: do check `parse_tree()`'s return value t4301: verify that merge-tree fails on missing blob objects Always check `parse_tree*()`'s return value builtin/checkout.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- builtin/clone.c | 3 ++- builtin/commit.c | 3 ++- builtin/merge-tree.c | 6 ++++++ builtin/read-tree.c | 3 ++- builtin/reset.c | 4 ++++ cache-tree.c | 4 ++-- merge-ort.c | 16 +++++++++++----- merge-recursive.c | 3 ++- merge.c | 5 ++++- reset.c | 5 +++++ sequencer.c | 4 ++++ t/t4301-merge-tree-write-tree.sh | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 13 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) base-commit: 5f43cf5b2e4b68386d3774bce880b0f74d801635 Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1651%2Fdscho%2Fmerge-tree-and-missing-objects-v1 Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1651/dscho/merge-tree-and-missing-objects-v1 Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1651 -- gitgitgadget