Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I think this was what the earlier discussion in the RFC series was too, > but Phillip definitely helped consolidate the point. > > I'll send a new version of this patch series with `--include-root-refs` > option and we can discuss on top of that. Thanks. By the way, I am not married to the "root refs" name, but - we do not want to say "all refs", as I expect refs from other worktrees are not included, and possibly the option when combined with explicit patterns, like refs/tags/, may further be used to limit the output; - we do not want to say "pseudo refs", as I expect we would want to show HEAD that is (unfortunately) classified outside "pseudoref" class.
