On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:53 PM Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 6:58 AM Christian Couder > <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In general when we know a pointer variable is NULL, it's clearer to > > explicitely return NULL than to return that variable. > > s/explicitely/explicitly/ [...] > > Let's make the code clearer and more uniform by also explicitely > > returning NULL when 'revs->ignore_missing' is true. > > s/explicitely/explicitly/ Thanks, it's fixed in my current version. Not sure I have to resend just to fix this though.
