Re: [PATCH] rebase: standardize on $() for command substitution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/1/07, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dan McGee <dpmcgee@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Commit 889a50e909dba5f4416049afc5eeae601fe133bc changed several `` to $()
> > format for command substitution, so we should standardize on one format
> > for clarity.
> > ...
> > @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ do
> >       -s|--s|--st|--str|--stra|--strat|--strate|--strateg|--strategy)
> >               case "$#,$1" in
> >               *,*=*)
> > -                     strategy=`expr "z$1" : 'z-[^=]*=\(.*\)'` ;;
> > +                     strategy=$(expr "z$1" : 'z-[^=]*=\(.*\)'` ;)
> >               1,*)
> >                       usage ;;
> >               *)
>
> The patch might have meant well, but it is a rather unnecessary
> code churn without fixing anything and introducing a bug X-<.

Wow, back to the drawing board here. I've been up too long today.

-Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux