Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > It seems that this topic has fallen into the cracks or something, > while the associated pch looks good to me. Yeah, it wasn't clear to me that your message you are responding to was your Reviewed-by:. If I recall my impression correctly from the time I skimmed its proposed log message the last time, it focused on describing a single failure case the author encountered in the real world and said that the patch changed the behaviour to correct that single case, and was not very clear if it was meant as a general fix. Is the patch text, including its proposed patch description, satisfactory to you? In other words, is the above your Reviewed-by:? Thanks for pinging the thread.
