Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Given this, I think for the next version, I'll do the following changes: > 1. keep `is_pseudoref_syntax()` as is. > 2. introduce `is_pseudoref()` which calls `is_pseudoref_syntax()` and > also checks the content of the file. > 3. replace use of `is_pseudoref_syntax()` with `is_pseudoref()` in this > patch series. The content check in 2. was something that was mentioned in an earlier discussion, lack of which I completely missed during the review of this current round. Sounds very good to add that. Thanks.
