Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I not sure I quite understand what you mean here. Are you saying that > scripts should stop using "git update-ref" and "git rev-parse" for > anything that does not match the new pseudoref syntax? Yes, I am saying that, and also that we should have been stricter on what we accept and consider as pseudorefs---not just any file that sits directly under $GIT_DIR/., but ideally we should have limited to "^[A-Z]*_HEAD$" or something. The idea I am floating is to see if such a tightening can be done now without hearing too many screams.