Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Heh, I was hoping that we should be able to use "diff --name-only". >> >> $ git mv Makefile Breakfile >> $ git diff --name-only -M HEAD >> Breakfile >> $ git reset --hard >> $ git rm Makefile >> $ >Breakfile && git add Breakfile >> $ git diff --name-only -M HEAD >> Breakfile >> Makefile >> $ git reset --hard > > I guess we could, since the only thing in this repository is a file > which is being renamed, and we can then deduce based on the setup that > the change we expected must have happened. > > However, I didn't like the deduce bit; since --name-only only lists > one of the two filenames and doesn't provide any hint that the change > involved is a rename, it felt to me like using --name-only would make > the test not really be a rename test. Hmph, I am not quite seeing what you are saying. If the "mv" from Makefile to Breakfile in the above example is between preimage and postimage that are similar enough, then we will see "one" paths, i.e. the file in the "after" side of the diff. But if the "mv" from Makefile to Breakfile involves too large a content change (like, say, going from 3800+ lines to an empty file, in the second example above), then because such a change from Makefile to Breakfile is too dissimilar, we do not judge it as "renamed" and show "two" paths. I do not quite see where we need to "deduce".
