Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I am not very happy with the hardcoded 97. You are already using >> the non-standard 10% threshold. If the delta detection that >> forgets about the last line is so broken as your proposed log >> message noted, shouldn't you be able to construct a sample pair of >> preimage and postimage for which the broken version gives so low >> similarity to be judged not worth treating as a rename, while the >> fixed version gives reasonable similarity to be made into a rename, >> by the default threshold? That way, the test only needs to see if >> we got a rename (with any similarity) or a delete and an add. > > Oops, the threshold is entirely unnecessary here; not sure why I > didn't remember to take it out (originally used the threshold while > testing without the fix to just how low of a similarity git thought > these nearly identical files had). > > Since you don't like the threshold, and since we don't seem to have a > summary format that reports on the rename without the percentage, I > guess I need to munge the output with sed: > > sed -e "s/^R[0-9]* /R /" actual >actual.munged && Heh, I was hoping that we should be able to use "diff --name-only". $ git mv Makefile Breakfile $ git diff --name-only -M HEAD Breakfile $ git reset --hard $ git rm Makefile $ >Breakfile && git add Breakfile $ git diff --name-only -M HEAD Breakfile Makefile $ git reset --hard
