On 2024-01-18 21:19, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 2024-01-18 19:26, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Perhaps having both options available could be a good thing.
Though,
adding quite a few knobs may end up confusing the users, so we
should
make sure to document it well.
I agree there is a need for documentation, but we are not increasing
the number of knobs, are we?
Perhaps there would be one more knob if we end up deciding to
implement
support for both approaches, as previously discussed.
But that would be just one knob (which I personally do not quite see
the need for), not "quite a few knobs" as you said, no?
I'm sorry for being imprecise. Regarding the need for that additional
"global" knob, I think it can't hurt. Some people might even find it
quite useful, and the good thing is that it wouldn't make the internal
logic significantly more complicated.