On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:10:54PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Michael Lohmann <mi.al.lohmann@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> but we may want to tighten the original's use of repo_get > >> > - if (repo_get_oid(the_repository, "MERGE_HEAD", &oid)) > >> > - die("--merge without MERGE_HEAD?"); > >> > - other = lookup_commit_or_die(&oid, "MERGE_HEAD"); > >> > >> ... so that we won't be confused in a repository that has a tag > >> whose name happens to be MERGE_HEAD. We probably should be using > >> refs.c:refs_resolve_ref_unsafe() instead to _oid() here ... > > > > Here I am really at the limit of my understanding of the core functions. > > Is this roughly what you had in mind? From my testing it seems to do the > > job, but I don't understand the details "refs_resolve_ref_unsafe"... > > Perhaps there are others who are more familiar with the ref API than > I am, but I was just looking at refs.h today and wonder if something > along the lines of this ... > > if (read_ref_full("MERGE_HEAD", > RESOLVE_REF_READING | RESOLVE_REF_NO_RECURSE, > &oid, NULL)) > die("no MERGE_HEAD"); > if (is_null_oid(&oid)) > die("MERGE_HEAD is a symbolic ref???"); > > ... would be simpler. > > With the above, we are discarding the refname read_ref_full() > obtains from its refs_resolve_ref_unsafe(), but I think that is > totally fine. We expect it to be "MERGE_HEAD" in the good case. > The returned value can be different from "MERGE_HEAD" if it is > a symbolic ref, but if the comment in refs.h on NO_RECURSE is to be > trusted, we should catch that case with the NULL-ness check on oid. Yeah, this should be fine. Even though I have stared at our refs API for extended periods of time during the last months I still have to look up this part of the API almost every time. I find it to be hard to use because you not only have to pay attention to the return value, but also to the flags in some edge cases. I wouldn't be surprised if there were many callsites that get this wrong. > Which would mean that we do not need a separate "other_head" > variable, and instead can use "MERGE_HEAD". There is no need for this, is there? We have already resolved the ref to an object ID, so why not use that via `add_pending_oid()`? Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature