Re: [RFC PATCH] `log --merge` also for rebase/cherry pick/revert

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Lohmann <mi.al.lohmann@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This extends the functionality of `git log --merge` to also work with
> conflicts for rebase, cherry pick and revert.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Lohmann <mi.al.lohmann@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  ... It is basically the counterpart to
> `git show ${ACTION}_HEAD` for understanding the source of the conflict.

I do not know about the validity of that approach to use *_HEAD, but
we may want to tighten the original's use of repo_get_oid() here ...

> -	if (repo_get_oid(the_repository, "MERGE_HEAD", &oid))
> -		die("--merge without MERGE_HEAD?");
> -	other = lookup_commit_or_die(&oid, "MERGE_HEAD");

... so that we won't be confused in a repository that has a tag
whose name happens to be MERGE_HEAD.  We probably should be using
refs.c:refs_resolve_ref_unsafe() instead to 

 (1) ensure MERGE_HEAD is a ref, 
 (2) obtain the oid without any prefixing by refs.c:repo_dwim_ref(),
     and optionally
 (3) error out when MERGE_HEAD is a symref.

As your patch makes the problem even worse, if we were to do such a
tightening (and I do not see a reason not to), it may want to be
done before, not after, this patch.

I won't comment on the coding style violations in the patch below in
this message.

Thanks.

> diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
> index 2424c9bd67..2e5c00dabd 100644
> --- a/revision.c
> +++ b/revision.c
> @@ -1961,23 +1961,37 @@ static void add_pending_commit_list(struct rev_info *revs,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static char* get_action_head_name(struct object_id* oid)
> +{
> +	if (!repo_get_oid(the_repository, "MERGE_HEAD", oid)) {
> +		return "MERGE_HEAD";
> +	} else if (!repo_get_oid(the_repository, "REBASE_HEAD", oid)) {
> +		return "REBASE_HEAD";
> +	} else if (!repo_get_oid(the_repository, "CHERRY_PICK_HEAD", oid)) {
> +		return "CHERRY_PICK_HEAD";
> +	} else if (!repo_get_oid(the_repository, "REVERT_HEAD", oid)) {
> +		return "REVERT_HEAD";
> +	} else
> +		die("--merge without MERGE_HEAD, REBASE_HEAD, CHERRY_PICK_HEAD or REVERT_HEAD?");
> +}
> +
>  static void prepare_show_merge(struct rev_info *revs)
>  {
>  	struct commit_list *bases;
>  	struct commit *head, *other;
>  	struct object_id oid;
>  	const char **prune = NULL;
> +	const char *action_head_name;
>  	int i, prune_num = 1; /* counting terminating NULL */
>  	struct index_state *istate = revs->repo->index;
>  
>  	if (repo_get_oid(the_repository, "HEAD", &oid))
>  		die("--merge without HEAD?");
>  	head = lookup_commit_or_die(&oid, "HEAD");
> -	if (repo_get_oid(the_repository, "MERGE_HEAD", &oid))
> -		die("--merge without MERGE_HEAD?");
> -	other = lookup_commit_or_die(&oid, "MERGE_HEAD");
> +	action_head_name = get_action_head_name(&oid);
> +	other = lookup_commit_or_die(&oid, action_head_name);
>  	add_pending_object(revs, &head->object, "HEAD");
> -	add_pending_object(revs, &other->object, "MERGE_HEAD");
> +	add_pending_object(revs, &other->object, action_head_name);
>  	bases = repo_get_merge_bases(the_repository, head, other);
>  	add_rev_cmdline_list(revs, bases, REV_CMD_MERGE_BASE, UNINTERESTING | BOTTOM);
>  	add_pending_commit_list(revs, bases, UNINTERESTING | BOTTOM);




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux