Re: [PATCH] mem-pool: fix big allocations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 24.12.23 um 04:11 schrieb Elijah Newren:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:13 PM René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Add a basic unit test to demonstate the issue by using mem_pool_calloc()
>
> demonstrate (missing 'r')?

Yes.  I didn't intend to mention any demons or states, let alone a
demon state. *facepalm*

> Nice catch; looks good to me.  Out of curiosity, how'd you find the issue?

I was working on using a memory pool for name-rev.  I played with
different values for block_alloc, not fully sure why anymore -- either
for checking the performance impact or testing robustness.

René





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux