Memory pool allocations that require a new block and would fill at
least half of it are handled specially. Before 158dfeff3d (mem-pool:
add life cycle management functions, 2018-07-02) they used to be
allocated outside of the pool. This patch made mem_pool_alloc() create
a bespoke block instead, to allow releasing it when the pool gets
discarded.
Unfortunately mem_pool_alloc() returns a pointer to the start of such a
bespoke block, i.e. to the struct mp_block at its top. When the caller
writes to it, the management information gets corrupted. This affects
mem_pool_discard() and -- if there are no other blocks in the pool --
also mem_pool_alloc().
Return the payload pointer of bespoke blocks, just like for smaller
allocations, to protect the management struct.
Also update next_free to mark the block as full. This is only strictly
necessary for the first allocated block, because subsequent ones are
inserted after the current block and never considered for further
allocations, but it's easier to just do it in all cases.
Add a basic unit test to demonstate the issue by using mem_pool_calloc()
with a tiny block size, which forces the creation of a bespoke block.
Without the mem_pool_alloc() fix it reports zeroed pointers:
ok 1 - mem_pool_calloc returns 100 zeroed bytes with big block
# check "((pool->mp_block->next_free) != (((void*)0))) == 1" failed at t/unit-tests/t-mem-pool.c:22
# left: 0
# right: 1
# check "((pool->mp_block->end) != (((void*)0))) == 1" failed at t/unit-tests/t-mem-pool.c:23
# left: 0
# right: 1
not ok 2 - mem_pool_calloc returns 100 zeroed bytes with tiny block
1..2
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx>
---
Makefile | 1 +
mem-pool.c | 6 +++---
t/unit-tests/t-mem-pool.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 t/unit-tests/t-mem-pool.c
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 88ba7a3c51..15990ff312 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1340,6 +1340,7 @@ THIRD_PARTY_SOURCES += sha1collisiondetection/%
THIRD_PARTY_SOURCES += sha1dc/%
UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS += t-basic
+UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS += t-mem-pool
UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS += t-strbuf
UNIT_TEST_PROGS = $(patsubst %,$(UNIT_TEST_BIN)/%$X,$(UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS))
UNIT_TEST_OBJS = $(patsubst %,$(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/%.o,$(UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS))
diff --git a/mem-pool.c b/mem-pool.c
index c34846d176..e8d976c3ee 100644
--- a/mem-pool.c
+++ b/mem-pool.c
@@ -99,9 +99,9 @@ void *mem_pool_alloc(struct mem_pool *pool, size_t len)
if (!p) {
if (len >= (pool->block_alloc / 2))
- return mem_pool_alloc_block(pool, len, pool->mp_block);
-
- p = mem_pool_alloc_block(pool, pool->block_alloc, NULL);
+ p = mem_pool_alloc_block(pool, len, pool->mp_block);
+ else
+ p = mem_pool_alloc_block(pool, pool->block_alloc, NULL);
}
r = p->next_free;
diff --git a/t/unit-tests/t-mem-pool.c b/t/unit-tests/t-mem-pool.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2295779b0b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/unit-tests/t-mem-pool.c
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+#include "test-lib.h"
+#include "mem-pool.h"
+
+#define check_ptr(a, op, b) check_int(((a) op (b)), ==, 1)
+
+static void setup_static(void (*f)(struct mem_pool *), size_t block_alloc)
+{
+ struct mem_pool pool = { .block_alloc = block_alloc };
+ f(&pool);
+ mem_pool_discard(&pool, 0);
+}
+
+static void t_calloc_100(struct mem_pool *pool)
+{
+ size_t size = 100;
+ char *buffer = mem_pool_calloc(pool, 1, size);
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < size; i++)
+ check_int(buffer[i], ==, 0);
+ if (!check_ptr(pool->mp_block, !=, NULL))
+ return;
+ check_ptr(pool->mp_block->next_free, <=, pool->mp_block->end);
+ check_ptr(pool->mp_block->next_free, !=, NULL);
+ check_ptr(pool->mp_block->end, !=, NULL);
+}
+
+int cmd_main(int argc, const char **argv)
+{
+ TEST(setup_static(t_calloc_100, 1024 * 1024),
+ "mem_pool_calloc returns 100 zeroed bytes with big block");
+ TEST(setup_static(t_calloc_100, 1),
+ "mem_pool_calloc returns 100 zeroed bytes with tiny block");
+
+ return test_done();
+}
--
2.43.0
