On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 05:10:11AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 07:58:31AM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote: > > > > I chose the "a" for "address", but I'm not sold on %aa either. > > > I just couldn't find anything better that wasn't already taken. > > > > > > What about "a@"? > > > > Makes sense, and I suppose there's "%G?" as precedent for using a symbol > > rather than letter in these. > > This is pretty subjective, but I somehow find "%a@" hard to parse > visually (despite the fact that yes, "%G?" already crossed that bridge). > But I think the real nail in the coffin is your later comment that we > cannot use capitalization to make the raw/mailmap distinction. > > > If that's not suitable though, how about "m" for "mail domain"? It also > > immediately follows "l" for "local-part" in the alphabet. > > FWIW, that makes sense to me over "a" (though admittedly it is not > really any less vague than "a", so it really might vary from person to > person). Okay, I like 'm' better as well. And '@' is a no go because the mailmaped version. I'll resend. Cheers, Liam
