Re: [PATCH 2/2] tests: teach callers of test_i18ngrep to use test_grep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio

On 31/10/2023 05:23, Junio C Hamano wrote:
They are equivalents and the former still exists, so as long as the
only change this commit makes are to rewrite test_i18ngrep to
test_grep, there won't be any new bug, even if there still are
callers of test_i18ngrep remaining in the tree, or when merged to
other topics that add new uses of test_i18ngrep.

This patch was produced more or less with

     git grep -l -e 'test_i18ngrep ' 't/t[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh' |
     xargs perl -p -i -e 's/test_i18ngrep /test_grep /'

and a good way to sanity check the result yourself is to run the
above in a checkout of c4603c1c (test framework: further deprecate
test_i18ngrep, 2023-10-31) and compare the resulting working tree
contents with the result of applying this patch to the same commit.
You'll see that test_i18ngrep in a few t/lib-*.sh files corrected,
in addition to the manual reproduction.

Thanks for working on this. I have checked what you have in seen by checking out the first parent of ce56983dd3 (Merge branch 'jc/test-i18ngrep' into seen, 2023-11-01) and then converting "test_i18ngrep" to "test_grep" and diffing the result as you suggest above. The diff looks good and shows that you've corrected the additional t/lib-*.sh files. Grepping ce56983dd3 for "test_i18ngrep" shows there is one instance of test_i18ngrep that has not been coverted in contrib/mw-to-git/t/t9363-mw-to-git-export-import.sh.

Best Wishes

Phillip




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux