Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Thanks everyone for the revived discussion here. I think I agree, this > series is not going in the right direction. Additionally, our internal > use case for this change has evaporated, so let's just drop the series. > We can pick it up again later if interest returns. OK. Let's scrap it for now. The "internal use case" behind a proposed feature changing so quickly is a bit worrying. What is good for this project should ideally be good for everybody, not only for satisfying a particular $CORP needs of the day. But I think the idea of giving enhanced visibility into stakeholder companies directions and priorities Emily (I think?) floated during the contributors' summit may help reduce such a risk, hopefully. Thanks.
