Scott Parish <sRp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 11:18:02PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > We walk all the paths in $PATH collecting the names of "git-*" >> > commands. To help distinguish between the main git commands >> > and commands picked up elsewhere (probably extensions) we >> > print them seperately. The main commands are the ones that >> > are found in the first directory in $PATH that contains the >> > "git" binary. >> ... > Its not clear to me what exactly you're looking for me to change, > just the wording i'm using in my comment? Or are you refering to > the approach? "git" binary will be found as /usr/bin/git while git-foo will be found as /usr/libexec/git/git-foo in such an installation that takes advantage of $(gitexecdir). And /usr/libexec/git/git will not exist. Using existence of /usr/bin/git (I am referring to your 'first directory on $PATH that contains the "git" binary' above) as the cue for the location of "main commands" is wrong. > When i email the changes, should i keep emailing the whole > patch series, or just the few patches that have changed? It's up to you. Obviously, if you are replacing 2 patches out of 100-patch series, you would not want to resend the whole thing, though ;-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
