On 2023-10-10 14:44, Christian Couder wrote:
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 11:02 PM Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 2023-09-07 10:32, Christian Couder wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:03 PM Toon Claes <toon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > +DESCRIPTION >> > +----------- >> > + >> > +Takes a range of commits, and replays them onto a new location. Does >> > +not touch the working tree or index, and does not update any >> > +references. However, the output of this command is meant to be used >> >> Small suggestion here: >> >> Takes a range of commits, and replays them onto a new location. Does >> neither touch the working tree nor index, and does not update any >> references. > > I am not a native speaker, so I am not sure what's best here. I find > your suggestion a bit less clear though, so until a native speaker > agrees with it or maybe finds something even better, I prefer to leave > it as-is. I'm also not a native English speaker, but I spent about 2.5 years contributing a whole lot to English Wikipedia, so I'd dare to say I've honed my English skills rather well. Thus, here's my take on this: Takes a range of commits and replays them onto a new location. Leaves the working tree and the index untouched, and updates no references. The output of this command is to be used... This is written in a concise yet slightly imperative way, which should be suitable for the purpose. I hope you agree.I agree and I like it, so I have changed it to the above in version 5 I just sent.
Great, thanks.
