Re: [PATCH 07/15] commit-graph: new filter ver. that fixes murmur3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> However, I am not entirely sure I agree with you that this is a "new"
> issue. At least in the sense that Git (on 'master') does not currently
> know how to deal with Bloom filters that have different settings across
> commit-graph layers.
>
> IOW, you could produce this problem today using the test you wrote in
> <20201015132147.GB24954@xxxxxxxxxx> using different values of the
> GIT_BLOOM_SETTINGS environment variables as a proxy for different values
> of the commitGraph.changedPathsVersion configuration variable introduced
> in this series.
>
> So I think that this series makes it easier to fall into that trap, but
> the trap itself is not new. I think a reasonable stopgap (which IIUC you
> have suggested earlier) is to prevent writing a new commit-graph layer
> with a different hash version than the previous layer.

What we probably want more urgently than that stopgap is to perhaps
teach the code pretend as if commit-graph did not exist when we
detect multiple layers use different hash versions (or perhaps only
use the base layer and ignore the rest as an anti-pessimization), to
protect correctness first, no?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux