On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 12:42 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Naomi Ibe <naomi.ibeh69@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > "Select a microproject and check that it has not yet been taken or > > discussed by searching the mailing list. Public Inbox is your friend." > > Yeah, that is VERY unfriendly. There is no mention on the pool of > microproject ideas from which you can "select" here. I wonder if > some HTML link is missing in the sentence (i.e., clicking a word > leading to a page that lists what you can select from), or it has > always been like this. This sentence has been like that for a long time. I have just improved it to the following: "* Select a microproject and check that it has not yet been taken or discussed by searching the mailing list. Please read all the sections below related to finding or selecting a microproject." I have also made it clearer that the list these sentences are in is a "Summary of the steps needed to complete a microproject" by adding a section with that title. > Later in the same document, I see > > How to find other ideas for microprojects > > First check the specific page(s) or information about Git > microprojects related to your program that should have been > published on this site or on the GSoC or Outreachy site. But then > still read on everything below! > > which is much more realistic, as long as the "specific page(s)" are > well curated (which I have no idea myself, as I have never been in > the mentoring pool). Naomi, have you checked and found such a page > on Outreachy site? There is no such page as I haven't taken the time to write one. But I have added the following paragraph just below the above one: "It’s also possible that we haven’t taken the time to put up a page listing microprojects ideas for your program. The pages we used to create for that were named “XXXX Applicant Microprojects” where XXXX is the program name and a date, for example “SoC 2016 Applicant Microprojects” for the GSoC in 2016, or “Outreachy Winter 2021-2022 Applicant Microprojects” for Outreachy in 2021-2022. See the following directory to find these old pages that might still be useful: https://git.github.io/Historical-SoC-Outreachy/"; I am not sure how others feel about this, but I think it would be better in the future to not have to prepare such pages, and to just have a section with a number of examples of good microprojects on this https://git.github.io/General-Microproject-Information/ page. It will be easier to update this section when we know about other good ideas or better ideas, or when we want to remove an idea that we don't consider good anymore, or just update an idea. > Then it goes on to suggest finding a bug report, but I tend to think > that fixing them is way oversized to be a good microproject. I agree that it's oversized for most bugs. I have just added the following paragraph at the end of this "Searching for bug reports" subsection: "Also some bugs are difficult to understand and require too much or too difficult work for a microproject, so don’t spend too much time on them if it appears that they might not be simple to fix, and don’t hesitate to ask on the mailing list if they are a good microproject." > And finally it gives a casual mention of good+first+issue, which is > probably the closest to what _should_ be listed as the first place > to try (sorry, I however do not know how well the list is curated, > either, but from a cursory look it looks legit). > > https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22good+first+issue%22 > > There also is a mention of #leftoverbits in the document, but by its > nature, they can easily become stale or irrelevant, and they tend to > be more real issues, and I would expect them to be unnecessarily > harder than what dip-your-toe-in-the-water-and-say-hello > microprojects need to be. I have just added the following at the end of the subsection about #leftoverbits: "As for bugs, and many things really, you can also ask if you are not sure it's simple enough to fix." Thanks for reviewing the doc!
