Naomi Ibe <naomi.ibeh69@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> "Select a microproject and check that it has not yet been taken or
> discussed by searching the mailing list. Public Inbox is your friend."
Yeah, that is VERY unfriendly. There is no mention on the pool of
microproject ideas from which you can "select" here. I wonder if
some HTML link is missing in the sentence (i.e., clicking a word
leading to a page that lists what you can select from), or it has
always been like this.
Later in the same document, I see
How to find other ideas for microprojects
First check the specific page(s) or information about Git
microprojects related to your program that should have been
published on this site or on the GSoC or Outreachy site. But then
still read on everything below!
which is much more realistic, as long as the "specific page(s)" are
well curated (which I have no idea myself, as I have never been in
the mentoring pool). Naomi, have you checked and found such a page
on Outreachy site?
Then it goes on to suggest finding a bug report, but I tend to think
that fixing them is way oversized to be a good microproject.
And finally it gives a casual mention of good+first+issue, which is
probably the closest to what _should_ be listed as the first place
to try (sorry, I however do not know how well the list is curated,
either, but from a cursory look it looks legit).
https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22good+first+issue%22
There also is a mention of #leftoverbits in the document, but by its
nature, they can easily become stale or irrelevant, and they tend to
be more real issues, and I would expect them to be unnecessarily
harder than what dip-your-toe-in-the-water-and-say-hello
microprojects need to be.
