Štěpán Němec <stepnem@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Come to think of it, 'doc: fix some typos, grammar and wording issues' > might have made sense to begin with; I don't suppose C header comments > are off-limits to doc:. Yup, they do count as part of developer documentation. >>> diff --git a/contrib/README b/contrib/README >>> @@ -24,14 +24,14 @@ lesser degree various foreign SCM interfaces, so you know the >>> I expect that things that start their life in the contrib/ area >>> -to graduate out of contrib/ once they mature, either by becoming >>> +graduate out of contrib/ once they mature, either by becoming >> >> You probably want to add a comma after "area". > > That would read awkward to me. How about going the other way, > > I expect things that start their life in the contrib/ area > to graduate out of contrib/ once they mature > > instead? That reads well. I do not recall whom "I" in this sentence refers to, but if this were me talking about my wish, then yes, I expect them to graduate once they mature, and the ">>>" quoted change to drop "to" does not sound grammatical. Thanks for working on improving the documentation, thanks for reviewing, and thanks for working well together.
