Linus Arver wrote:
> FWIW we already have some guidelines about what is acceptable for doc
> patches in SubmittingPatches:
>
> We currently have a liberal mixture of US and UK English norms for
> spelling and grammar, which is somewhat unfortunate. A huge patch that
> touches the files all over the place only to correct the inconsistency
> is not welcome, though. Potential clashes with other changes that can
> result from such a patch are not worth it. We prefer to gradually
> reconcile the inconsistencies in favor of US English, with small and
> easily digestible patches, as a side effect of doing some other real
> work in the vicinity (e.g. rewriting a paragraph for clarity, while
> turning en_UK spelling to en_US). Obvious typographical fixes are much
> more welcomed ("teh -> "the"), preferably submitted as independent
> patches separate from other documentation changes.
>
> and both the 2-space vs 1-space and comma changes seem to fall into the
> "not welcome" category.
Ok, then, I think at this point I'll abandon this PR.
I could probably find the time to justify rewriting one paragraph in
this single file to try to abide by the requirements, but it doesn't
seem worth it. I'm sorry I wasted everyone's time.
