Linus Arver <linusa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > ... I prefer the > WHERE_UNSPECIFIED as in this patch because the WHERE_DEFAULT is > ambiguous on its own (i.e., WHERE_DEFAULT could mean that we either use > the default value WHERE_END in default_conf_info, or it could mean that > we fall back to the configuration variables (where it could be something > else)). Yup. "Turning something that is left UNSPECIFIED after command line options and configuration files are processed into the hardcoded DEFAULT" is one mental model that is easy to explain. I however am not sure if it is easier than "Setting something to hardcoded DEFAULT before command line options and configuration files are allowed to tweak it, and if nobody touches it, then it gets the hardcoded DEFAULT value in the end", which is another valid mental model, though. If both can be used, I'd personally prefer the latter, and reserve the "UNSPECIFIED to DEFAULT" pattern to signal that we are dealing with a case where the simpler pattern without UNSPECIFIED cannot solve. The simpler pattern would not work, when the default is defined depending on a larger context. Imagine we have two Boolean variables, A and B, where A defaults to false, and B defaults to some value derived from the value of A (say, opposite of A). In the most natural implementation, you'd initialize A to false and B to unspecified, let command line options and configuration variables to set them to true or false, and after all that, you do not have to tweak A's value (it will be left to false that is the default unless the user or the configuration gave an explicit value), but you need to check if B is left unspecified and tweak it to true or false using the final value of A. For a variable with such a need like B, we cannot avoid having "unspecified". If you initialize it to false (or true), after the command line and the configuration files are read and you find B is set to false (or true), you cannot tell if the user or the configuration explicitly set B to false (or true), in which case you do not want to futz with its value based on what is in A, or it is false (or true) only because nobody touched it, in which case you need to compute its value based on what is in A. And that is why I asked if we need to special case "the user did not touch and the variable is left untouched" in the trailer subsystem. Thanks.
