Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Oh I should have looked more carefully at the existing uses. It looks > like it is only my sequencer patch that does > > sigchain_push(SIGINT, SIG_IGN); > sigchain_push(SIGQUIT, SIG_IGN); > res = run_command(...); Hmph, does it mean this patch would become unnecessary, once you fix the above sequence to follow the pattern "to spawn and then ignore"?
