"Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > [3] This is really a work-around for not moving the child into its own > process group and changing the foreground process group of the > controlling terminal. I am puzzled, as I somehow thought that "does the user conceive a subprocess as external and different-from-git entity, or is it merely an implementation detail? many use of subprocesses in our codebase, it is the latter." from Peff was a good argument against such isolation between spawning "git" and spawned subprocesses.
