On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 04:36:51PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote: > But a following change will store cruft- and non-cruft packs separately, > meaning this check would break as a result. Prepare for this by > extracting this part of the check into a new helper function called > `has_existing_non_kept_packs()`. > > This patch does not introduce any functional changes, but prepares us to > make a more isolated change in a subsequent patch. OK, that makes sense. -Peff
