On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 11:16 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > + /* > > + * Reject any pathspec. (They are allowed and eaten by > > + * setup_revisions() above.) In the future we might accept > > + * them, after adding related tests and doc though. > > + */ > > + if (revs.prune_data.nr) { > > + error(_("invalid pathspec: %s"), revs.prune_data.items[0].match); > > This made me waste a few minutes wondering if and how I misspelt my > pathspec elements. If we mean "no pathspec is allowed", we should > say so instead. Yeah, right. I have changed this to: error(_("no pathspec is allowed: '%s'"), revs.prune_data.items[0].match); > > + usage_with_options(replay_usage, replay_options); > > + }