Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@xxxxxx> writes:
> make this fully orthogonal to reverting reverts in particular (note
> that i attached it to the generic "discussion" patch rather than the
> "reverts of reverts" one).
I viewed that as a patch to add "discussion on how to explain
revert" (not necessarily "revert of revert", but how "revert" in
general should be explained).
> i didn't think about the integration with existing options yet.
Now I did ;-).
The discussion of what the right way to present and justify a revert
was done before, and I think revert.reference and the "--reference"
option came out of it. It aims the same "do not just describe the
fact what was reverted, but you should explain why" spirit. While
what I showed in my illustration patch was not meant as "integration
with existing options", it is inevitable that reuse of existing code
that was written earlier for improving the workflow in the same
spirit may get involved.
Perhaps we should also tweak the commit log template to give a
gentle knudge to the user to use revert.reference and then enhance
the help text we give.
Instead of
Revert "doc: revert: add discussion"
This reverts commit 7139d1298993b0148ad429cd7cb4824223b7f420.
you may see something along the lines of ...
# Consider retitling to reflect WHY you are reverting.
# You may also want to set revert.reference configuration to
# help encuraging a better title for revert commits.
Revert "doc: revert: add discussion"
This reverts commit 7139d1298993b0148ad429cd7cb4824223b7f420
because <REASON OF REVERSION HERE>
I ran out of time budget for today to think about a topic that is
not releant to the current release, so I'd stop here.
THanks.
