[PATCH v2] branch: update the message to refuse touching a branch in-use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The "git branch -f" command can refuse to force-update a branch that
is used by another worktree.  The original rationale for this
behaviour was that updating a branch that is checked out in another
worktree, without making a matching change to the index and the
working tree files in that worktree, will lead to a very confused
user.  "git diff HEAD" will no longer give a useful patch, because
HEAD is a commit unrelated to what the index and the working tree in
the worktree were based on, for example.

These days, the same mechanism also protects branches that are being
rebased or bisected, and the same machanism is expected to be the
right place to add more checks, when we decide to protect branches
undergoing other kinds of operations.  We however forgot to rethink
the messaging, which originally said that we are refusing to touch
the branch because it is "checked out" elsewhere, when d2ba271a
(branch: check for bisects and rebases, 2022-06-14) started to
protect branches that are being rebased or bisected.

The spirit of the check has always been that we do not want to
disrupt the use of the same branch in other worktrees.  Let's reword
the message slightly to say that the branch is "used by" another
worktree, instead of "checked out".

We could teach the branch.c:prepare_checked_out_branches() function
to remember why it decided that a particular branch needs protecting
(i.e. was it because it was checked out?  being bisected?  something
else?) in addition to which worktree the branch was in use, and use
that in the error message to say "you cannot force update this
branch because it is being bisected in the worktree X", etc., but it
is dubious that such extra complexity is worth it.  The message
already tells which directory the worktree in question is, and it
should be just a "chdir" away for the user to find out what state it
is in, if the user felt curious enough.  So let's not go there yet.

Helped-by: Josh Sref <jsoref@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 * Instead of saying "branch in use", use a bit more natural "branch
   is used by ...".

 branch.c                  |  2 +-
 t/t2407-worktree-heads.sh | 10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/branch.c b/branch.c
index cdf70b0ef0..3e4684f79f 100644
--- a/branch.c
+++ b/branch.c
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ int validate_new_branchname(const char *name, struct strbuf *ref, int force)
 
 	if ((path = branch_checked_out(ref->buf)))
 		die(_("cannot force update the branch '%s' "
-		      "checked out at '%s'"),
+		      "used by worktree at '%s'"),
 		    ref->buf + strlen("refs/heads/"), path);
 
 	return 1;
diff --git a/t/t2407-worktree-heads.sh b/t/t2407-worktree-heads.sh
index 019a40df2c..469443d8ae 100755
--- a/t/t2407-worktree-heads.sh
+++ b/t/t2407-worktree-heads.sh
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ test_expect_success !SANITIZE_LEAK 'refuse to overwrite: worktree in bisect' '
 	git -C wt-4 bisect good wt-1 &&
 
 	test_must_fail git branch -f wt-4 HEAD 2>err &&
-	grep "cannot force update the branch '\''wt-4'\'' checked out at.*wt-4" err
+	grep "cannot force update the branch '\''wt-4'\'' used by worktree at.*wt-4" err
 '
 
 test_expect_success !SANITIZE_LEAK 'refuse to overwrite: worktree in rebase (apply)' '
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ test_expect_success !SANITIZE_LEAK 'refuse to overwrite: worktree in rebase (app
 	test_must_fail git -C wt-2 rebase --apply conflict-2 &&
 
 	test_must_fail git branch -f wt-2 HEAD 2>err &&
-	grep "cannot force update the branch '\''wt-2'\'' checked out at.*wt-2" err
+	grep "cannot force update the branch '\''wt-2'\'' used by worktree at.*wt-2" err
 '
 
 test_expect_success !SANITIZE_LEAK 'refuse to overwrite: worktree in rebase (merge)' '
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ test_expect_success !SANITIZE_LEAK 'refuse to overwrite: worktree in rebase (mer
 	test_must_fail git -C wt-2 rebase conflict-2 &&
 
 	test_must_fail git branch -f wt-2 HEAD 2>err &&
-	grep "cannot force update the branch '\''wt-2'\'' checked out at.*wt-2" err
+	grep "cannot force update the branch '\''wt-2'\'' used by worktree at.*wt-2" err
 '
 
 test_expect_success !SANITIZE_LEAK 'refuse to overwrite: worktree in rebase with --update-refs' '
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ test_expect_success !SANITIZE_LEAK 'refuse to overwrite: worktree in rebase with
 	for i in 3 4
 	do
 		test_must_fail git branch -f can-be-updated HEAD 2>err &&
-		grep "cannot force update the branch '\''can-be-updated'\'' checked out at.*wt-3" err ||
+		grep "cannot force update the branch '\''can-be-updated'\'' used by worktree at.*wt-3" err ||
 			return 1
 	done
 '
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ test_expect_success 'refuse to overwrite when in error states' '
 	for i in 1 2
 	do
 		test_must_fail git branch -f fake-$i HEAD 2>err &&
-		grep "cannot force update the branch '\''fake-$i'\'' checked out at" err ||
+		grep "cannot force update the branch '\''fake-$i'\'' used by worktree at" err ||
 			return 1
 	done
 '
-- 
2.41.0-376-gcba07a324d




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux