Re: [PATCH] ls-tree: fix --no-full-name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] ls-tree: fix --no-full-name
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 13:14:43 -0700
Cc: Git List <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <xmqq4jlxuiuu.fsf@gitster.g> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 21 Jul 2023 13:09:45 -0700")
References: <d392a005-4eba-7cc7-9554-cdb8dc53975e@web.de> <xmqqo7k9fa5x.fsf@gitster.g> <a6326aaa-4f05-4d00-8906-2f50ea8e1e7a@web.de> <xmqq351hz5xp.fsf@gitster.g> <43ca3f01-ba11-6c29-a8e8-4e6c262a68cc@web.de> <xmqq4jlxuiuu.fsf@gitster.g>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)

Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This is a good starting point, but we should at least exempt
> OPT_BOOL from this exercise, I would think, because ...

No, no no, that was nonsense.  The literal "yes" fooled me.
There is no need to special-case OPT_BOOL at all.

Sorry for the noise.

References:
- [PATCH] ls-tree: fix --no-full-name
  - From: René Scharfe
- Re: [PATCH] ls-tree: fix --no-full-name
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: [PATCH] ls-tree: fix --no-full-name
  - From: René Scharfe
- Re: [PATCH] ls-tree: fix --no-full-name
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: [PATCH] ls-tree: fix --no-full-name
  - From: René Scharfe
- Re: [PATCH] ls-tree: fix --no-full-name
  - From: Junio C Hamano

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ls-tree: fix --no-full-name
Next by Date: [PATCH v2] branch: update the message to refuse touching a branch in-use
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ls-tree: fix --no-full-name
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ls-tree: fix --no-full-name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux