Re: [RFC PATCH 6/8] pager: remove pager_in_use()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Glen Choo <chooglen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Having the function isn't just nice for typo prevention - it's also a
> reasonable boundary around the pager subsystem. We could imagine a
> world where we wanted to track the pager status using a static
> var instead of an env var (not that we'd even want that :P), and this
> inlining makes that harder.
>
> From the cover letter, it seems like we only need this to remove
> "#include pager.h" from date.c, and that's only used in
> parse_date_format(). Could we add a is_pager/pager_in_use to that
> function and push the pager.h dependency upwards?

Thanks---I think that may show a good direction.  parse_date_format()
reacts to "auto:foo" and as long as that feature needs to be there,
pager_in_use() must be available to the function.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux