Re: [PATCH 4/5] replace strbuf_expand() with strbuf_expand_step()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 06:31:55PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:

> > It does still feel like we should be handling "%%" on behalf of the
> > callers.
> 
> I feel the same, but restrained myself from doing that, so that we
> can see all the pieces for now.  It allows us to recombine them in
> better ways than before.

Yeah, since you did the work to handle "%%" in each caller, I'm OK with
proceeding and letting a later refactor shrink it back down if we
choose.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux