On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 06:31:55PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote: > > It does still feel like we should be handling "%%" on behalf of the > > callers. > > I feel the same, but restrained myself from doing that, so that we > can see all the pieces for now. It allows us to recombine them in > better ways than before. Yeah, since you did the work to handle "%%" in each caller, I'm OK with proceeding and letting a later refactor shrink it back down if we choose. -Peff