Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > This is the first normal (not RFC) version of this series. The following > cover letter is identical to the previous one up to but not including > section “RFC and version 1”. I have no strong opinion on the topic and did not comment on the RFC version, either, so I am puzzled to be CC'ed, especially when the primary author of the feature is not. Dscho, how does this series look? Thanks.
